data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98276/98276502d6f20ec9b615108d7d3b80815578ec8f" alt=""
Friday, February 25, 2011
American Wigeon
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98276/98276502d6f20ec9b615108d7d3b80815578ec8f" alt=""
Redhead
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f6d8/2f6d8b35f1b5348b195148c061099eb04166bfff" alt=""
Harlequin Duck
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31289/312890aa4386f2ecee6873886af267a1b1138f2b" alt=""
Friday, February 11, 2011
Long-billed Curlew
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79dcd/79dcd680dec4639b5504b14da879ba8194885946" alt=""
Thursday, February 10, 2011
How do I hate thee Adobe ? Let me count the ways
Every time I see Adobe praising itself over features or design of its products, I wonder if anyone buys into that pile of horsesh*t, or if I'm the only one experiencing issues with Lightroom. Lightroom has a decent UI design, but the underlying code in it does some supremely stupid things at times. I have LR set to write the sidecar files upon modification, and if I start changing the photo location, a favorite thing for LR to do is to interrupt my typing into the next text field (e.g. city) while saving the contents of another location field. It likes to do that by dropping the input focus from the text box and making the characters I've already typed correspond to commands in either the Grid view of the Develop view. Sometimes it'll just drop characters, which is at least less random. Since LR knows I'm typing into the text box, it chooses to ignore that when doing the UI update.
But I don't expect that bug will ever be fixed. Adobe's focus is on hype.
Apparently it's not just me, because I encountered a rant about Photoshop CS5 that is rather analogous to my experiences with Lightroom (which is still young, and therefore rather harder for Adobe to screw up quite as comprehensively).
Enjoy: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2010/11/cs5.html
I work in academia and get Photoshop (I use CS4) and Lightroom on the cheap. I'd be a lot more angry if I have to buy that sort of crap software engineering at street prices.
Alternative ways that Adobe tries to mess with you ? See the Scott Kelby blog about their new "upgrade" policy.
But I don't expect that bug will ever be fixed. Adobe's focus is on hype.
Apparently it's not just me, because I encountered a rant about Photoshop CS5 that is rather analogous to my experiences with Lightroom (which is still young, and therefore rather harder for Adobe to screw up quite as comprehensively).
Enjoy: http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2010/11/cs5.html
I work in academia and get Photoshop (I use CS4) and Lightroom on the cheap. I'd be a lot more angry if I have to buy that sort of crap software engineering at street prices.
Alternative ways that Adobe tries to mess with you ? See the Scott Kelby blog about their new "upgrade" policy.
Yet Another Oriole - Audubon's
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2832d/2832d336dc0c485a9fb139f65fac3e3394e42d62" alt=""
Monday, February 7, 2011
Altamira Oriole
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b73f3/b73f362b4d041a2e7b2a6a36df10a5859f2a4a90" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95de0/95de03d1b6fe2f3061b5176c397643ca0d47636c" alt=""
Black-vented Oriole
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a530/3a530c464b0e3c84a5d0fddc8160d7d6cefcebfe" alt=""
The 600mm shrinks
I've carried the Canon 500mm f4L-IS in preference to the bigger/heavier/more expensive 600mm telephoto for some time. I use it in Central Park and like it in particular for its short minimum focus distance. Now Canon have formally announced the successor to both the 500mm and 600mm supertelephotos:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1102/11020709canon500mm600mm.asp
and the first thing I noticed is what I suspected might happen - the new 600mm has become as light as the old 500mm and has the same minimum focus distances as the old 500mm. Of course this new 600mm will be very expensive for a while even after it hits the streets, but it is going to be a very attractive lens. In the meanwhile I think I'll try using the 800mm plus extension tubes and see how that goes, although the 800mm will be too large a magnification for some of the bigger species of birds at it's minimum focus distance.
Spec for the old 500mm is here:
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup/ef_500mm_f_4l_is_usm#Specifications
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1102/11020709canon500mm600mm.asp
and the first thing I noticed is what I suspected might happen - the new 600mm has become as light as the old 500mm and has the same minimum focus distances as the old 500mm. Of course this new 600mm will be very expensive for a while even after it hits the streets, but it is going to be a very attractive lens. In the meanwhile I think I'll try using the 800mm plus extension tubes and see how that goes, although the 800mm will be too large a magnification for some of the bigger species of birds at it's minimum focus distance.
Spec for the old 500mm is here:
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup/ef_500mm_f_4l_is_usm#Specifications
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
An unanticipated problem with Vermilion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46f8f/46f8fde7a5adfdce1006c75d3a87f18cfa42f84b" alt=""
The other thing I noticed is an apparent reduced level of detail compared to what I was expecting. This probably has a lot to do with the saturation of the red color in the first place, but I'm not sure if the Bayer sensor (which is RGGB, and therefore may be less accurate with pure reds and blues than it is with greens) had a role to play in this too. Ironically, I got better feather detail from shots in more overcast conditions than I got in sunlight. But with Vermilion Flycatcher I will take what I can get - they do not seem that willing to let me approach them very much, and they are quite a small bird.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Orange-crowned Warbler
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46b03/46b039e79ed5b86affb99f97ba48a8078bb80162" alt=""
Crested Caracara
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e12f/2e12ffccd3ba82196e1395bb5df9a3377aa353c6" alt=""
Crested Caracaras usually watch me long enough to stop the car and then exit the scene. This undoubtedly reflects the tendency of bozos to shoot at them. So of course this especially tame adult at Laguna Atascosa NWR in Texas was actually a little too close for my 800mm lens, and I couldn't quite cram all of it in the frame. Nevertheless the amount of resolved detail in the full-size image is startling (not so obvious in a smaller JPG like this).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)